Saturday, June 24, 2006


Beethoven 1st and 9th, LSO, Bernard Haitink

The concert tonight was the LSO playing Beethoven's 1st and 9th at the Barbican, conducted by Bernard Haitink - a programme no less than magnificent and, in a way, for me, weirdly profound.

Beethoven's Symphony No. 1 in C Major. I remember having a discussion once about keys with M, a wonderful and wonderfully wise friend, many years ago in law school. I announced that my favourite key was E major (!) - absolutely no idea why I said that - and asked him what his favourite key was. And I vividly remember M sitting still on the university steps for a few seconds, before he turned to me and said, "C major". I complained that C major was boring - it's the first scale you learn, turning childish fingers stiffly and painfully on the keyboard; it has no fancy sharps or flats; it's banal and lacklustre. And M smiled.

Beethoven's Ninth Symphony. What - and I ask this rhetorically - can one say about the Ninth? For a piece that finally articulated itself in words with the human voice, implausibly I find it impossible to write anything about Beethoven's Ninth. This music has accompanied some of the worst years of my life - my desperate, terrified final term in law school; my first year in London, among others. Years in which, even if I didn't know it at that time, my life changed or was changing like leaves in the wind. I used to relish (and M knows this) the loud, angry parts - the terror fanfare, the D minor resolution to the acceleration of the arpeggiation in the 1st movement introduction. Those were my favourite parts. Yet, tonight, I realised that the music which caught me most were not those, but, instead, a series of moments in the third movement: dolce, cantabile sections with pizzicato for the strings while the flutes trill, or the clarinets climb a scale.

The third movement used to bore me silly. It was then that I realised, and realised how much I had to go through to realise. Simplicity. Clarity. Tabula rasa.

<$BlogItemCommentCount$> Comments:

Marc Chan said...

Dear Jenna,

I know it's a very early post, so forgive the terribly delayed comment, okay? =)

I'm sure you know Messiaen's Quartet for the End of Time. I've been thinking alot about that piece recently, especially with regard to slowness and ecstasy. There are two profoundly beautiful movements for piano/ cello and piano/ violin. They act as middle and end for the entire quartet. Interestingly enough, both these movements have a key signature of E major. So maybe there's something to E major after all. =)

The thing that most intrigues me is the metronome marking of 16th note=44 and 8th note=36. That's painfully, painfully slow! And there is the wonderfully strange disconnect between the notation and the sound to ponder about as well.

Marc

3:30 PM  

<$BlogItemCommentCount$> Comments:

Momo said...

Hey,

Don't worry abt it. I think the only Messiaen I know was the piece you played for me way back...... Anyway, I've just given the Quartuor a listen, you're right (as always) - it is incredibly beautiful. I dunno abt E major though. :-) One thing ref the last movement: do you know Marvin Gaye's "Inner City Blues (Make Me Wanna Holler)"? Incongruous as this sounds, I find startling connections between the two. Same bass, same religion, same death, same spirit - and ok, different everything else. Check it out.

I'm now looking exclusively into time (well, temporal dynamics, whatever that means) myself - I have no idea how it happened, but maybe I should revisit the "Hart, Unger..." list.

On slowness, I'd just finished Godard's "Sauve qui peut (la vie)" ("Slow Motion") and it's got very interesting uses of step-printed slow motion, though nowhere as exhilarating as Chungking Express. (Though I might have read somewhere - Girish? - that perhaps Wong Kar-Wai learnt slow motion from Godard...?)

And then there's also something I read about Ken Jacobs's "Tom, Tom, the Piper's Son"..... aaaarrgh, go back to Boston soon! There's so much I want to tell you......

11:36 AM  

<$BlogItemCommentCount$> Comments:

Marc Chan said...

It all sounds so intriguing! I popped down to our local Borders hoping to find the Barthes book on photography, needless to say, I could not. I'm predicting the same outcome for the films you cited. I need to get back to Boston to see if I can get hold of everything you've recommended so far. Keep them coming! Slow-mo rocks!! =)

Marc

10:41 AM  

<$BlogItemCommentCount$> Comments:

Momo said...

Oh well, that's not entirely unexpected...... nonetheless (mostly credit to you) I have fond memories of the local Borders.

*lol* yes it does, indeed. Let's talk someday.

11:11 AM  

Post a Comment